18th July 2014 – Case for a Creator

To combat the idea that the universe had a beginning meaning that people would have to consider the probability of a designer or a ‘transcendent cause’, some scientists have been working on alternatives to the Big Bang. So here are a couple of the most commonly known/accepted alternatives:

  • Sagan’s Oscillating Model
  • no absolute beginning – the universe expands and collapses in a cycle
  • but… a certain density is needed to generate enough gravity to ‘crunch’ and our universe simply isn’t that dense
  • it also contradicts known laws of physics
  • Hawking’s view
  • the idea of a singularity or point of beginning is eliminated
  • he sees it more like this:
  • bb2
  • however, we encounter a philosophical error by assuming that having a beginning means having a beginning point – there is still a finite past
  • he also substitutes imaginary numbers into his equations (multiples of √-1)
  • this turns time into a dimension of space but when you want real, physical answers, you need to convert them to real numbers but by doing that you get a singularity!
  • so this theory seems to fall flat on its face and Hawking recognises that it’s not a realistic description but he says it’s a mathematical model of the universe in a way that a singularity does not appear.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s